| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jrenaut
Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Posts: 304 Location: Trollville
|
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:38 am Post subject: A list of things everyone here can agree on |
|
|
Because it is clear that everyone here hates everyone else, I thought we might try a little community-building exercise.
I'm going to start a list of things that I think everyone who reads or posts on this forum is in favor of and a list of things that I think everyone who reads or posts on this forum is against.
FOR:
1) Working escalators at the Metro
2) Clean air to breathe
3) Well-behaved puppies owned by responsible people.
AGAINST:
1) Vacant storefronts
2) Crime
3) Brain-eating zombies
Can you think of any more things for either list? Please, add your suggestions! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DCDireWolf
Joined: 18 May 2007 Posts: 542
|
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| actually, i am sometimes, depending on my mood, against working escalators at the metro. sometimes I think we should be like NYC and only have escalators at the really deep stations. they cost too much to fix all the time and people need the exercise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
domrep
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 213
|
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Rock climbing as the up escalator, and a slide as the down escalator. Make it happen Metro, and they could hand out towels to anyone who needs it. It's cheaper, will get people fit...and it looks cool. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
steveg202
Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 221 Location: 13th - 14th on Irving Street, NW
|
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jrenaut -you couldn't even find 3 things we all agree on. Doesn't say much for the future of your thread.
I'd say diverse food but I don't want to insult those who find eating repetitive and fattening. Breathing good air but not at the expense of poor areas that can't afford greener space. Less crime, but I don't want to take away an outlet for those who can't find a job. This is harder than I thought. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrenaut
Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Posts: 304 Location: Trollville
|
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How about:
1) Ranting
2) Bitterness
3) Bile
4) Disagreement
5) Everyone is cool with puppies, right? So long as their owners keep them under control and clean up after them? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. T

Joined: 03 Feb 2006 Posts: 902
|
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I prefer cats to puppies, ha ha ha! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alaaro

Joined: 06 Mar 2006 Posts: 573 Location: 11th and Park
|
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Frankly, I dont mind dog poop. Helps the grass grow.  _________________ Adam Aaronson
11th and Park |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrenaut
Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Posts: 304 Location: Trollville
|
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| How about well-behaved baby animals? Does that make everyone happy? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
whovous
Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 7:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SAo long as they are fixed so that they cannot reproduce more well-behaved baby animals. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrenaut
Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Posts: 304 Location: Trollville
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 7:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| By well-behaved, I of course meant to include, "Only reproducing at appropriate times and in appropriate numbers". Certainly the baby panda at the zoo, for example, should be encouraged to reproduce when it's old enough? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. T

Joined: 03 Feb 2006 Posts: 902
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The pandas are obviously provided as a flim-flam entertainments for all the newcomers who have been brought in as part of the gentrification model of development, as fostered by the Jim Graham - Dan Tangherlini regime. The resources, specifically the TIF monies from the luxury condominiums, should be instead allocated to an inclusive infrastructure and social programs geared towards the needs of the non-panda viewing population (the vast majority of people here). Any panda reproduction would be at the expense of CH. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrenaut
Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Posts: 304 Location: Trollville
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| That's why we'll hold the baby panda's offspring for ransom. The Chinese government thinks they're getting it back? Ha. Over our dead bodies. We can carry guns now, right? We want $30 million dedicated to the betterment of our neighborhood for all residents, or the panda gets US citizenship. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jennrgolden

Joined: 15 Mar 2007 Posts: 170 Location: 17th and Newton
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mr. T wrote: | | I prefer cats to puppies, ha ha ha! |
LMAO!!!!! _________________ - Jenn |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|