| Court Ruling In "95/5" Case |
|
|
|
| Written by Columbia Heights News | ||||
| Thursday, 23 March 2006 | ||||
|
Councilmember Jim Graham - Press Release. Washington, DC - The District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled today that individual tenants in buildings sold in so-called "95/5" transactions cannot sue to challenge those transactions. The Court also ruled that 95/5 sales did not trigger the tenants right of first refusal.
"The first chance we got, we changed the law," said Councilmember Jim Graham (D-Ward One), chair of the Committee on Consumer and Regulatory Affairs. "Under the old law, tenants are very sadly out of luck. But we stopped new 95/5 transactions cold. The court has acknowledged this in its ruling today." Councilmember Graham introduced a bill on January 18, 2005 to clarify the definition of "sale" and block future 95/5 transactions. This bill became law July 23, 2005. The appeals court decision can be found online: DC Appeals. New law covering 95/5 transactions: 95/5 Law.
Alan Heymann
Powered by AkoComment! |
||||
| Last Updated ( Wednesday, 14 March 2007 ) | ||||

